Click Here to read Roll Call's Report on the Risks of Dark Money Support and CPA's Fight for Transparency.



CPA Article on Distorting Impact of 'Dark Money' Featured in Fiscal Times' Series

Feb. 23, 2015

How Dark Money Is Distorting Politics and Undermining Democracy

By Bruce F. Freed and Karl J. Sandstrom

The Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision and subsequent court rulings deregulating political spending have greatly increased the influence of corporate special interests. Today, corporations are among the leading underwriters of Washington politics and a dominant force shaping its policy-making. Long gone are the days when unions and government could balance the impact of corporations.

At the same time, a large swath of political spending has gone underground. Prior to Citizens United, election spending by companies, unions and individuals was subject to limits and carried out with disclosure of donors. Post-Citizens United, the limits are gone for corporations. Donor secrecy reigns. Corporations can spend to influence elections directly, or indirectly through trade associations or so-called “social welfare” organizations as long as these groups don’t coordinate with a political candidate. The result is significant growth in “dark money” influence.

Read the entire series at The Fiscal Times.

January 2015 Spotlight on CPA Articles

Link to January 2015 Spotlight on CPA Newsletter

Washington Post Op-Ed: U.S. Companies Shine Sunlight on 'Dark Money'

(The following op-ed by Bruce F. Freed, CPA president, and Charles E.M. Kolb, president of the Committee for Economic Development from 1997 to 2012 and deputy assistant for domestic policy to President George H.W. Bush from 1990 to 1992, appeared in The Washington Post on Dec. 29, 2014.)

In the nearly five years since the Supreme Court’s controversial Citizens United ruling, a significant movement in U.S. corporate governance has gained traction without attracting much notice: An expanding cross-section of U.S. businesses are acting independently to create a culture of transparency and accountability in regard to their influence on our political system.

Roll Call Highlights CPA Successes

The Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision five years ago has generated a conservative backlash against disclosure. In addition it has spawned a conservative drive “to discredit political transparency, forestall new reporting restrictions and challenge disclosure regulations in court,” analyst Eliza Newlin Carney says in a Roll Call column that prominently mentions the Center for Political Accountability.

USA Today Column: Attacks Show U.S. Chamber, Allies Losing Secret Political Spending Fights

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and its lobbying allies are losing in their defense of secret political spending as more companies embrace transparency, a recentUSAToday.com column by independent business writer Darrell Delamaide declared.
 
Mentioning attacks by the Chamber and others against the Center for Political Accountability, Delamaide not only asked what defenders of secret political money “are … afraid of,” he also said a new business ethic favored by many companies is passing by the old guard.

Leading Law Firm Urges Companies to Treat CPA-Zicklin Index Seriously

The Center for Political Accountability’s lead role in advocating for corporate political disclosure was spotlighted in a guide issued by the Covington & Burling law firm, entitled “Responding to Corporate Political Disclosure Initiatives.”
 
“CPA’s role as the major player in the political spending disclosure arena will continue to grow this year,” stated the “How-To Guide for In-House Counsel,” dated Jan. 14.

As 2015 Proxy Season Opens, Political Disclosure Tops 130 Companies

Four companies have adopted the Center for Political Accountability's model disclosure resolution in the start of the 2015 proxy season, bringing to 133 the number of public companies accepting the resolution.


 

Powered by Orchid Suites
Orchid ver. 4.7.6.